Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-18 06:11:35 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41398DDF3BF05BB47EA4FC670991F4D67AFEEFB49FE4A0E6AB053B6343982C8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Le post n’est pas trompeur. Certains guillemets auraient pu effectivement être amendés de crochets car les termes ont parfois été recontextualisés. Mais ils représentent bien les propos tenus par la députée et ne les déforment pas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714226565444161558
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41398DDF3BF05BB47EA4FC670991F4D67AFEEFB49FE4A0E6AB053B6343982C8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1697609495820
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171422656544416155841398DDF3BF05BB47EA4FC670991F4D67AFEEFB49FE4A0E6AB053B6343982C8F