Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-16 16:27:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75FF73857DA6835025BD93E0A71F2FBC78E373873F5FC45A8171E4FA5236E391
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Telegraph article asserts that Orwell (personally) treated others badly, not that his writings advocated such. Indeed, it suggests a contradiction. The proposed note completely misses the point, and defends Orwell’s writing from a non-existent attack. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713939490564108746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75FF73857DA6835025BD93E0A71F2FBC78E373873F5FC45A8171E4FA5236E391
  • createdAtMillis - 1697473630400
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171393949056410874675FF73857DA6835025BD93E0A71F2FBC78E373873F5FC45A8171E4FA5236E391