Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 07:44:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F6ACDE842625BF9344041F268E20468B51C8DF7888C8AACBAD39AECAA2D78B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Telegraph article asserts that Orwell (personally) treated others badly, not that his writings advocated such. Indeed, it suggests a contradiction. The proposed note completely misses the point, and defends Orwell’s writing from a non-existent attack. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713939490564108746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F6ACDE842625BF9344041F268E20468B51C8DF7888C8AACBAD39AECAA2D78B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1697528657767
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17139394905641087463F6ACDE842625BF9344041F268E20468B51C8DF7888C8AACBAD39AECAA2D78B1