Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-16 11:51:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 99A9B2640E858560381A40E0833037CF6B2CDF9EED912CA00B3E03B708323DDA
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's not "misleading" but it does serve to counter its own supposed intention by bringing even more attention to the original paid tweet! The whole thing, tweet, comment, community note, ALL could be just marketing top to bottom as far as we know. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713874638630015034
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 99A9B2640E858560381A40E0833037CF6B2CDF9EED912CA00B3E03B708323DDA
  • createdAtMillis - 1697457063559
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171387463863001503499A9B2640E858560381A40E0833037CF6B2CDF9EED912CA00B3E03B708323DDA