Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-16 12:30:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F9491C8A2322303E56FF648F7918AE438F7628043D05B8F2E8FBA8F999CDD30
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's not "misleading" but it does serve to counter its own supposed intention by bringing even more attention to the original paid tweet! The whole thing, tweet, comment, community note, ALL could be just marketing top to bottom as far as we know. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713874638630015034
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F9491C8A2322303E56FF648F7918AE438F7628043D05B8F2E8FBA8F999CDD30
  • createdAtMillis - 1697459409256
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17138746386300150344F9491C8A2322303E56FF648F7918AE438F7628043D05B8F2E8FBA8F999CDD30