Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-15 12:03:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49EF724EFF72A7898E09C7F51038009CC1AEDF1BE799009D8309BF2F84CE9566
Participant Details

Original Note:

証拠を抑える手続きで違法なことがあった場合、証拠の内容に関わらず裁判では証拠としては認めらないため、動画のような行為は警察に引き渡せたとしても徒労に終わる可能性があります。 参考 覚醒剤取締法違反に問われ、採尿の結果も陽性だったが、警察の強制検尿の手続が違法だったため無罪となった事例 https://www.jiji.com/amp/article?k=2023041801180&g=soc

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713485807020113937
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49EF724EFF72A7898E09C7F51038009CC1AEDF1BE799009D8309BF2F84CE9566
  • createdAtMillis - 1697371428506
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171348580702011393749EF724EFF72A7898E09C7F51038009CC1AEDF1BE799009D8309BF2F84CE9566