Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 00:01:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 806C371FCF1BF8562E678F2D233CAF34E319D1A33FD78B3E9760CAEDB393A01A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This only tallies votes from unusually remote areas, not from cities, towns or postal votes. The indigenous population throughout Lingiari is substantial - far more so than other electorates. The Yes vote was substantially lower in (and near) towns, and in postals to date. https://www.pollbludger.net/fed2023ref/Results/HR.htm?s=Lingiari

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713453633306841434
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 806C371FCF1BF8562E678F2D233CAF34E319D1A33FD78B3E9760CAEDB393A01A
  • createdAtMillis - 1697500895730
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1713453633306841434806C371FCF1BF8562E678F2D233CAF34E319D1A33FD78B3E9760CAEDB393A01A