Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 03:24:00 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D6CE9AD9E274DF5D9E5D772CE041AECF9CBA7066482537A887B08F5B4F32D49C
Participant Details

Original Note:

証拠を抑える手続きが違法である場合、証拠の内容に関わらず裁判では証拠としては認めらないため、動画のような行為は徒労に終わる可能性があります。 参考 覚醒剤取締法違反に問われ、採尿の結果も陽性だったが、強制検尿の手続が違法だったため無罪となった事例 https://www.jiji.com/amp/article?k=2023041801180&g=soc

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713366059678675418
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D6CE9AD9E274DF5D9E5D772CE041AECF9CBA7066482537A887B08F5B4F32D49C
  • createdAtMillis - 1697685840618
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1713366059678675418D6CE9AD9E274DF5D9E5D772CE041AECF9CBA7066482537A887B08F5B4F32D49C