Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-18 14:56:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B8E60D8D6BCC7F0D3DCBC29E3B0822E03BB48BA1C77CBC3D5AC94D9A0D6276F
Participant Details

Original Note:

証拠を抑える手続きが違法である場合、証拠の内容に関わらず裁判では証拠としては認めらないため、動画のような行為は徒労に終わる可能性があります。 参考 覚醒剤取締法違反に問われ、採尿の結果も陽性だったが、強制検尿の手続が違法だったため無罪となった事例 https://www.jiji.com/amp/article?k=2023041801180&g=soc

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713366059678675418
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7B8E60D8D6BCC7F0D3DCBC29E3B0822E03BB48BA1C77CBC3D5AC94D9A0D6276F
  • createdAtMillis - 1697640973186
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17133660596786754187B8E60D8D6BCC7F0D3DCBC29E3B0822E03BB48BA1C77CBC3D5AC94D9A0D6276F