Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-15 04:09:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3536A8C4A9C7525FE2D5A7D1110C62D51C0C3E65F7B71C06CA203B1EAD4CD828
Participant Details

Original Note:

証拠を抑える手続きが違法である場合、証拠の内容に関わらず裁判では証拠としては認めらないため、動画のような行為は徒労に終わる可能性があります。 参考 覚醒剤取締法違反に問われ、採尿の結果も陽性だったが、強制検尿の手続が違法だったため無罪となった事例 https://www.jiji.com/amp/article?k=2023041801180&g=soc

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713366059678675418
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3536A8C4A9C7525FE2D5A7D1110C62D51C0C3E65F7B71C06CA203B1EAD4CD828
  • createdAtMillis - 1697342957913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17133660596786754183536A8C4A9C7525FE2D5A7D1110C62D51C0C3E65F7B71C06CA203B1EAD4CD828