Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-15 05:11:54 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E575A2C403B067C1ACC98951217FE7C0C1599CC0C5FE4A109E1C85B712543DE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The referendum wasn't only to recognize First Nation peoples it included an advisory body for those groups that would be constitutionally guaranteed. The exact wording can be found in the provided source. The best comparison would be to the now-defunct ATSIC. Source: https://voice.gov.au/resources/fact-sheet-referendum-question-and-constitutional-amendment

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713346839809040508
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E575A2C403B067C1ACC98951217FE7C0C1599CC0C5FE4A109E1C85B712543DE7
  • createdAtMillis - 1697346714413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1713346839809040508E575A2C403B067C1ACC98951217FE7C0C1599CC0C5FE4A109E1C85B712543DE7