Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-15 03:11:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D469D82935B7F1F3591A3DFBF2C53041854C663F196E6608D6830AC8662D7C9D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The referendum wasn't only to recognize First Nation peoples it included an advisory body for those groups that would be constitutionally guaranteed. The exact wording can be found in the provided source. The best comparison would be to the now-defunct ATSIC. Source: https://voice.gov.au/resources/fact-sheet-referendum-question-and-constitutional-amendment

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713346839809040508
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D469D82935B7F1F3591A3DFBF2C53041854C663F196E6608D6830AC8662D7C9D
  • createdAtMillis - 1697339494784
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1713346839809040508D469D82935B7F1F3591A3DFBF2C53041854C663F196E6608D6830AC8662D7C9D