Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-15 02:10:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7B353FE259161A9BDFEFE9CC0537CADD32D846EDD5E1DD4F69D63F0786C0792
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP is using a misleading headline. In the same article the OP shares it clearly says “ HCQ is not a panacea, and of course, further research needs to be done. After all, you can't just conclude from an observational study like ours whether something works or not," https://t.co/xFwilluDKQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713243302789611575
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7B353FE259161A9BDFEFE9CC0537CADD32D846EDD5E1DD4F69D63F0786C0792
  • createdAtMillis - 1697335842096
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1713243302789611575C7B353FE259161A9BDFEFE9CC0537CADD32D846EDD5E1DD4F69D63F0786C0792