Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-14 18:27:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55DC37E4B674FBAD8A4C3FD118F62936B02C66E73E12D46BFB0C6BD22F3F0707
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP is using a misleading headline. In the same article the OP shares it clearly says “ HCQ is not a panacea, and of course, further research needs to be done. After all, you can't just conclude from an observational study like ours whether something works or not," https://t.co/xFwilluDKQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713243302789611575
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55DC37E4B674FBAD8A4C3FD118F62936B02C66E73E12D46BFB0C6BD22F3F0707
  • createdAtMillis - 1697308063105
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 171324330278961157555DC37E4B674FBAD8A4C3FD118F62936B02C66E73E12D46BFB0C6BD22F3F0707