Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 03:12:50 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9DC149884841720F1546907EAB086E6E9C96BCC6B71EA6CC3079D34A016B587F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The paper *never* supported the claim that SARS-CoV-2 emergence likely resulted from multiple zoonotic events. Therefore, it is not possible, even in principle, that it "still" supports this claim. https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abp8337

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713141268283593104
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9DC149884841720F1546907EAB086E6E9C96BCC6B71EA6CC3079D34A016B587F
  • createdAtMillis - 1705115570812
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17131412682835931049DC149884841720F1546907EAB086E6E9C96BCC6B71EA6CC3079D34A016B587F