Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 00:24:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5211937BF023BFB5D703D0EC2E926318ACA77B3288D545F4BCF1E62BC3009CE4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The paper *never* supported the claim that SARS-CoV-2 emergence likely resulted from multiple zoonotic events. Therefore, it is not possible, even in principle, that it "still" supports this claim. https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abp8337

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713141268283593104
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5211937BF023BFB5D703D0EC2E926318ACA77B3288D545F4BCF1E62BC3009CE4
  • createdAtMillis - 1708475087101
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17131412682835931045211937BF023BFB5D703D0EC2E926318ACA77B3288D545F4BCF1E62BC3009CE4