Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-26 13:24:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9EE0EBEACD030DD0EB9F05ADFE1911B8436D0F8E326D19A360AF81B33780222
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is missing the point, as it’s entirely based on semantics. AOCs claim obviously has a moral aspect that can’t possibly be properly analyzed just by examining intl law. Even if the question was “is this legal”, defining “military goals” can be complex and contradictive.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712814671491719412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9EE0EBEACD030DD0EB9F05ADFE1911B8436D0F8E326D19A360AF81B33780222
  • createdAtMillis - 1698326681357
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1712814671491719412E9EE0EBEACD030DD0EB9F05ADFE1911B8436D0F8E326D19A360AF81B33780222