Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-21 13:51:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9B3CC2F9B7AEBDFA50B0BDD65142010A775515C81127BE6E6CDB36384D47DB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is missing the point, as it’s entirely based on semantics. AOCs claim obviously has a moral aspect that can’t possibly be properly analyzed just by examining intl law. Even if the question was “is this legal”, defining “military goals” can be complex and contradictive.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712814671491719412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9B3CC2F9B7AEBDFA50B0BDD65142010A775515C81127BE6E6CDB36384D47DB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1726926704949
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1712814671491719412C9B3CC2F9B7AEBDFA50B0BDD65142010A775515C81127BE6E6CDB36384D47DB2