Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-16 15:02:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71231A97BB1EB386A3B0CDB5A95301D3616AE1777716B7B63FDE1F09C8ECB312
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is missing the point, as it’s entirely based on semantics. AOCs claim obviously has a moral aspect that can’t possibly be properly analyzed just by examining intl law. Even if the question was “is this legal”, defining “military goals” can be complex and contradictive.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712814671491719412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71231A97BB1EB386A3B0CDB5A95301D3616AE1777716B7B63FDE1F09C8ECB312
  • createdAtMillis - 1697468520065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171281467149171941271231A97BB1EB386A3B0CDB5A95301D3616AE1777716B7B63FDE1F09C8ECB312