Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-18 23:50:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40B547772F6DDEE402331748F77AB62C731F35ED086925349C1A38CEEB2BD9A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is missing the point, as it’s entirely based on semantics. AOCs claim obviously has a moral aspect that can’t possibly be properly analyzed just by examining intl law. Even if the question was “is this legal”, defining “military goals” can be complex and contradictive.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712814671491719412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40B547772F6DDEE402331748F77AB62C731F35ED086925349C1A38CEEB2BD9A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1726703414938
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 171281467149171941240B547772F6DDEE402331748F77AB62C731F35ED086925349C1A38CEEB2BD9A0