Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-14 06:51:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 910F7A98D3FDDF4ABA661CA7C08804C2D4AD9C2F76DB9181806F3FDF60E978A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

HRW makes a case, it is up to readers to review the evidence and agree, or disagree through comments. *No note needed.*

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712728022158029310
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 910F7A98D3FDDF4ABA661CA7C08804C2D4AD9C2F76DB9181806F3FDF60E978A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1697266309547
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712728022158029310910F7A98D3FDDF4ABA661CA7C08804C2D4AD9C2F76DB9181806F3FDF60E978A9