Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-14 05:37:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C08493633431A8C6C7612C99C43C165DEF727788ED8464F26BF4E3FD324E09D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The referendum is not specifically for constitutional recognition as this post claims, but for recognition "by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice". The distinction between recognition and a voice is politically contentious and should be noted. https://voice.gov.au/referendum-2023/referendum-question-and-constitutional-amendment

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712610167962087845
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C08493633431A8C6C7612C99C43C165DEF727788ED8464F26BF4E3FD324E09D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1697261865057
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712610167962087845C08493633431A8C6C7612C99C43C165DEF727788ED8464F26BF4E3FD324E09D0