Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 15:18:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3ACFD59E1DAED79F862EE41E0C4EAB4F5E2EF2DABD0E8D1B64121FD6CDE2EBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN : Le sondage cité a été financé par le promoteur de l'A69. Sa crédibilité est donc plus que discutable, tout comme la formulation ironique de la note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712530839572197584
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3ACFD59E1DAED79F862EE41E0C4EAB4F5E2EF2DABD0E8D1B64121FD6CDE2EBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1697815104892
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1712530839572197584B3ACFD59E1DAED79F862EE41E0C4EAB4F5E2EF2DABD0E8D1B64121FD6CDE2EBE