Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 17:07:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6CD968BCABAAF0EB304CE1CDD61E5FDC011C112466D5C882FC9074E0EB3969B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN If a journalist says he can confirm something it does not become untrue just because the picture is not on twitter. Relevant context would be journalist somehow being untrustworthy or somebody who should have good knowledge disputing. A random not believing is not relevant

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712500308033650748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E6CD968BCABAAF0EB304CE1CDD61E5FDC011C112466D5C882FC9074E0EB3969B
  • createdAtMillis - 1697130471172
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712500308033650748E6CD968BCABAAF0EB304CE1CDD61E5FDC011C112466D5C882FC9074E0EB3969B