Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 18:23:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE3A85E87056046C4DD9EC971E22D207E9398967D47785B1E91BA486DE2CCE21
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN If a journalist says he can confirm something it does not become untrue just because the picture is not on twitter. Relevant context would be journalist somehow being untrustworthy or somebody who should have good knowledge disputing. A random not believing is not relevant

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712500308033650748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE3A85E87056046C4DD9EC971E22D207E9398967D47785B1E91BA486DE2CCE21
  • createdAtMillis - 1697135035563
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712500308033650748DE3A85E87056046C4DD9EC971E22D207E9398967D47785B1E91BA486DE2CCE21