Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 21:29:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C92F164CE91099DD58FB6905AD261801250CB1999AFF615E00B74F7AF89FF99A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN If a journalist says he can confirm something it does not become untrue just because the picture is not on twitter. Relevant context would be journalist somehow being untrustworthy or somebody who should have good knowledge disputing. A random not believing is not relevant

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712500308033650748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C92F164CE91099DD58FB6905AD261801250CB1999AFF615E00B74F7AF89FF99A
  • createdAtMillis - 1697146151951
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712500308033650748C92F164CE91099DD58FB6905AD261801250CB1999AFF615E00B74F7AF89FF99A