Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 16:33:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E5F9A0B5E75336AE8739526CD4F1B0C4A8BE631DBF429C8EFF0133B0AE8F642
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN If a journalist says he can confirm something it does not become untrue just because the picture is not on twitter. Relevant context would be journalist somehow being untrustworthy or somebody who should have good knowledge disputing. A random not believing is not relevant

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712500308033650748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E5F9A0B5E75336AE8739526CD4F1B0C4A8BE631DBF429C8EFF0133B0AE8F642
  • createdAtMillis - 1697128391005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17125003080336507486E5F9A0B5E75336AE8739526CD4F1B0C4A8BE631DBF429C8EFF0133B0AE8F642