Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 16:10:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B0599F3B95CCA1F7227C9286BFD2755F618B5F08A62A5A5A0AE97AADA48BEC3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN If a journalist says he can confirm something it does not become untrue just because the picture is not on twitter. Relevant context would be journalist somehow being untrustworthy or somebody who should have good knowledge disputing. A random not believing is not relevant

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712500308033650748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3B0599F3B95CCA1F7227C9286BFD2755F618B5F08A62A5A5A0AE97AADA48BEC3
  • createdAtMillis - 1697127031979
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17125003080336507483B0599F3B95CCA1F7227C9286BFD2755F618B5F08A62A5A5A0AE97AADA48BEC3