Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 13:40:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1F605A494BA7147798D9BEA2093913E1F48B057455BB9EAF11DFCF9406BBE53
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. De forma complementaria a lo que dice la otra nota, destacar que usar como fuente tweets de una cuenta de tendencias ultraconservadoras o bien artículos de opinión de periódicos no es una fuente de confianza en un tema susceptible de las opiniones políticas de cada cuál.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712457912877215999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1F605A494BA7147798D9BEA2093913E1F48B057455BB9EAF11DFCF9406BBE53
  • createdAtMillis - 1697118048768
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712457912877215999F1F605A494BA7147798D9BEA2093913E1F48B057455BB9EAF11DFCF9406BBE53