Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 16:23:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4EC5817D3EE68EA49D909D2EC4423F9951261733A44D9AD9C9C6124FDDEAE850
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. De forma complementaria a lo que dice la otra nota, destacar que usar como fuente tweets de una cuenta de tendencias ultraconservadoras o bien artículos de opinión de periódicos no es una fuente de confianza en un tema susceptible de las opiniones políticas de cada cuál.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712457912877215999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4EC5817D3EE68EA49D909D2EC4423F9951261733A44D9AD9C9C6124FDDEAE850
  • createdAtMillis - 1697127839609
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17124579128772159994EC5817D3EE68EA49D909D2EC4423F9951261733A44D9AD9C9C6124FDDEAE850