Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-15 18:30:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 012A7C53315F749F0515D9619B618CDDA78ACB9C718CDC9C11C40E7F1FF80E34
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. De forma complementaria a lo que dice la otra nota, destacar que usar como fuente tweets de una cuenta de tendencias ultraconservadoras o bien artículos de opinión de periódicos no es una fuente de confianza en un tema susceptible de las opiniones políticas de cada cuál.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712457912877215999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 012A7C53315F749F0515D9619B618CDDA78ACB9C718CDC9C11C40E7F1FF80E34
  • createdAtMillis - 1697394644462
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712457912877215999012A7C53315F749F0515D9619B618CDDA78ACB9C718CDC9C11C40E7F1FF80E34