Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 08:53:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95
Participant Details

Original Note:

This page often doesn’t cite sources and shows bias towards statistics that ranks US affiliated data highly, meaning the data is not definitive. Other sources citing differing results include; https://www.forbes.com/innovative-companies/list/ https://www.fastcompany.com/most-innovative-companies/list https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/25-most-innovative-companies-world-120851363.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1712375687548473503
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95
createdAtMillis - 1697100783902
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 17123756875484735032A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95