Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 07:12:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFFB4661D2D6DA3954EF636216ACCB84FDBA0DE230C58632EF49C1CC7B2C06B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This is protected political speech and the claim of 1000 donors is a statement of fact. Theories about Cenk’s ineligibility or eligibility are matters to be litigated by the Courts not Twitter users. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/163/ https://www.cenkforamerica.com/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712328130273358026
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFFB4661D2D6DA3954EF636216ACCB84FDBA0DE230C58632EF49C1CC7B2C06B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1697094756549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712328130273358026EFFB4661D2D6DA3954EF636216ACCB84FDBA0DE230C58632EF49C1CC7B2C06B9