Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 04:54:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5F04C8685FFB8741F4BDAA6936BF7E63DD0012FF4FE151FDB26B9E9F7404836
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This is protected political speech and the claim of 1000 donors is a statement of fact. Theories about Cenk’s ineligibility or eligibility are matters to be litigated by the Courts not Twitter users. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/163/ https://www.cenkforamerica.com/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712328130273358026
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5F04C8685FFB8741F4BDAA6936BF7E63DD0012FF4FE151FDB26B9E9F7404836
  • createdAtMillis - 1697086468729
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712328130273358026E5F04C8685FFB8741F4BDAA6936BF7E63DD0012FF4FE151FDB26B9E9F7404836