Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 11:42:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1FCEB0615B7F976D37A402FEBCD5ABC677EA694282FD8FCF987D26C568B8C2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP claim that the subject "has now had his conviction overturned because he is under the age of 25" is incorrect. Appeal upheld as the judge misdirected jury in the original trial & 'There was an insufficiency of evidence for conviction.' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12618953/Man-conviction-quashed-jury-guilty-raping-13-year-old.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712225472375832706
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1FCEB0615B7F976D37A402FEBCD5ABC677EA694282FD8FCF987D26C568B8C2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1697110975455
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712225472375832706B1FCEB0615B7F976D37A402FEBCD5ABC677EA694282FD8FCF987D26C568B8C2F