Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-11 22:18:29 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 09AE73946AB32F4C78F8F399EF60E2DDD4D5321F24F6CCA17C05F7A5B042F3DB
Participant Details
Original Note:
OP claim that the subject "has now had his conviction overturned because he is under the age of 25" is incorrect. Appeal upheld as the judge misdirected jury in the original trial & 'There was an insufficiency of evidence for conviction.' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12618953/Man-conviction-quashed-jury-guilty-raping-13-year-old.html
All Note Details