Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-13 14:43:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09939B65ECB951770515C8A6F5355420CB7D8E315832F10BA77C41FC240E965F
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP claim that the subject "has now had his conviction overturned because he is under the age of 25" is incorrect. Appeal upheld as the judge misdirected jury in the original trial & 'There was an insufficiency of evidence for conviction.' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12618953/Man-conviction-quashed-jury-guilty-raping-13-year-old.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712225472375832706
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 09939B65ECB951770515C8A6F5355420CB7D8E315832F10BA77C41FC240E965F
  • createdAtMillis - 1697208207765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171222547237583270609939B65ECB951770515C8A6F5355420CB7D8E315832F10BA77C41FC240E965F