Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-12 09:43:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 651BADC112D400029A90CA219AC221C6E171E323C9C89541691596B957A4D446
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Mankind Quarterly" does not represent the scientific consensus. Wikipedia describes the journal as being "criticised as being both overtly political and strongly right-leaning, supporting eugenics, racist or fascist." Anthropologists do not consider it as trustworthy. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mankind_Quarterly#Reception https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-american-studies/article/abs/scientific-racism-again1-reginald-gates-the-mankind-quarterly-and-the-question-of-race-in-science-after-the-second-world-war/DD34BD25EB09D1905623A7C803F72B59

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712146368670625817
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 651BADC112D400029A90CA219AC221C6E171E323C9C89541691596B957A4D446
  • createdAtMillis - 1697103825158
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712146368670625817651BADC112D400029A90CA219AC221C6E171E323C9C89541691596B957A4D446