Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 08:09:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 218D18A33A7BD5BBB8FE6C51D31F3DA140965E08E4251B8C812C93CBDC640EC3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note needs to be better worded. At the moment it implies intent. While I agree with that assessment, there is also the possibility that it was accidental or negligent. It would be easy to change the wording to make it purely factual, and I recommend OP does that.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711923508929016036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 218D18A33A7BD5BBB8FE6C51D31F3DA140965E08E4251B8C812C93CBDC640EC3
  • createdAtMillis - 1697011767760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1711923508929016036218D18A33A7BD5BBB8FE6C51D31F3DA140965E08E4251B8C812C93CBDC640EC3