Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 03:04:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0171971417BE044D5326D2EFA953E528DAE29040D007DD6B9E0B65654162BAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

This paper has not passed any peer review, it carries a disclaimer that it does not represent the opinions of Statistics Norway (only of the individual authors), none of its authors are climate scientists, and many of the sources it cites have financial ties to fossil fuels. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03046

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711914824039612897
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0171971417BE044D5326D2EFA953E528DAE29040D007DD6B9E0B65654162BAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1696993476263
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1711914824039612897F0171971417BE044D5326D2EFA953E528DAE29040D007DD6B9E0B65654162BAF