Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 03:50:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C579FA182049B99C5BB962E8FCA81B19442016952E5D1AA492763B1A6DF65163
Participant Details

Original Note:

Two opinion peices that almost look like they plagiarized each other are not proof of misleading claims. No note needed unless someone finds actual factual claims are refuted with actual facts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711891416165818369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C579FA182049B99C5BB962E8FCA81B19442016952E5D1AA492763B1A6DF65163
  • createdAtMillis - 1696996223624
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1711891416165818369C579FA182049B99C5BB962E8FCA81B19442016952E5D1AA492763B1A6DF65163