Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 10:02:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C356FED74441B47E714E2194D3259B88F3E10BC2B7A3964803D8E403F70843EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Two opinion peices that almost look like they plagiarized each other are not proof of misleading claims. No note needed unless someone finds actual factual claims are refuted with actual facts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711891416165818369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C356FED74441B47E714E2194D3259B88F3E10BC2B7A3964803D8E403F70843EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1697018568533
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1711891416165818369C356FED74441B47E714E2194D3259B88F3E10BC2B7A3964803D8E403F70843EF