Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 18:34:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5E9959D074DF1B119216C7FF4E912E523E4A1FFCB52C3860287BEEB8155F41B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Two opinion peices that almost look like they plagiarized each other are not proof of misleading claims. No note needed unless someone finds actual factual claims are refuted with actual facts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711891416165818369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B5E9959D074DF1B119216C7FF4E912E523E4A1FFCB52C3860287BEEB8155F41B
  • createdAtMillis - 1697049292363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1711891416165818369B5E9959D074DF1B119216C7FF4E912E523E4A1FFCB52C3860287BEEB8155F41B