Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 07:57:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6DED5D6582FC048017B78C16C4F6CFF32E25A17DC0A16E5E1763920801097BE4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Two opinion peices that almost look like they plagiarized each other are not proof of misleading claims. No note needed unless someone finds actual factual claims are refuted with actual facts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711891416165818369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6DED5D6582FC048017B78C16C4F6CFF32E25A17DC0A16E5E1763920801097BE4
  • createdAtMillis - 1697011042926
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17118914161658183696DED5D6582FC048017B78C16C4F6CFF32E25A17DC0A16E5E1763920801097BE4