Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-23 06:53:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 038DD5E9330C99650CC6D65CD2BCB33B30656D231D60E04921FE9D32EE29E2AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Two opinion peices that almost look like they plagiarized each other are not proof of misleading claims. No note needed unless someone finds actual factual claims are refuted with actual facts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711891416165818369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 038DD5E9330C99650CC6D65CD2BCB33B30656D231D60E04921FE9D32EE29E2AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1698044007345
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1711891416165818369038DD5E9330C99650CC6D65CD2BCB33B30656D231D60E04921FE9D32EE29E2AE