Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-10 22:22:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 073AD32F4C739EB047D16792EC1EBC452D213AC97DA0D643F0FC10E485FD8AEF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nesse caso a OAB atuou como ÓRGÃO CONSULTIVO, na Comissão de Previdência, elaborando parecer concluindo pela inconstitucionalidade do PL 5167/2009. A OAB não tem prerrogativa para definir/declarar inconstitucionalidade de projeto de lei. https://congressoemfoco.uol.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Parecer-Comissao-Especial-da-Diversidade-Sexual-_231009_161644.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711764879575491061
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 073AD32F4C739EB047D16792EC1EBC452D213AC97DA0D643F0FC10E485FD8AEF
  • createdAtMillis - 1696976560067
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1711764879575491061073AD32F4C739EB047D16792EC1EBC452D213AC97DA0D643F0FC10E485FD8AEF