Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-10 11:11:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8EBC703EEB9CAB21E57A42D3A44C9F33AD3502419C83DF505CE3EE1448E9DAD7
Participant Details

Original Note:

JUNlPR’s tweet was neither misleading nor unironic. It was literally ironic- specifically, it was mockery, something very well-established to be a form of critique. It was clearly critique, and yet was taken down Critiquing this response is not at all somehow misleading

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711700757316345969
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8EBC703EEB9CAB21E57A42D3A44C9F33AD3502419C83DF505CE3EE1448E9DAD7
  • createdAtMillis - 1696936307629
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17117007573163459698EBC703EEB9CAB21E57A42D3A44C9F33AD3502419C83DF505CE3EE1448E9DAD7