Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-09 02:56:16 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 491A9B27EC9748588199179BD616148CE5CFC07AFF9C3FE0808C2E6F48A6B668
Participant Details

Original Note:

The fact that this paper is available on Zenodo, and not published in a peer-reviewed journal, suggests that it is a preprint. As a preprint, this paper has not yet been peer-reviewed, which means that it has not undergone the rigorous evaluation process by experts in the field.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711150662023606274
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 491A9B27EC9748588199179BD616148CE5CFC07AFF9C3FE0808C2E6F48A6B668
  • createdAtMillis - 1696820176627
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1711150662023606274491A9B27EC9748588199179BD616148CE5CFC07AFF9C3FE0808C2E6F48A6B668