Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-08 11:24:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE0770DC4D74FDE11B72869016AF15591FD8A3D27C6B828FF38EC172D192D514
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CN claims it's a fake but all it cites as proof is a tweet which isn't the most reliable source. Others in the comments say it's not fake. Eg: https://x.com/YossiTheFirst/status/1710789597649674371?s=20 This isn't any more of a reliable source than the original tweet, but more information is needed before we decide.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1710859206209794292
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE0770DC4D74FDE11B72869016AF15591FD8A3D27C6B828FF38EC172D192D514
  • createdAtMillis - 1696764286736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1710859206209794292FE0770DC4D74FDE11B72869016AF15591FD8A3D27C6B828FF38EC172D192D514