Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-08 16:17:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F146D383437114E4D0603AB616F09E5C85CC6C5B71883D5F6980BDFDCB1C57D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The above reply is incorrect, these are different studies even a cursory examination of the cohorts reveals this: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/andr.13181 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad125

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1710406261076812245
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F146D383437114E4D0603AB616F09E5C85CC6C5B71883D5F6980BDFDCB1C57D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1696781820967
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1710406261076812245F146D383437114E4D0603AB616F09E5C85CC6C5B71883D5F6980BDFDCB1C57D4